Why ESG carries material weight for fixed-income investors

August 23, 2019 — In this Q&A, the Eaton Vance floating-rate loan team offers its perspective on today’s loan market.

By: Craig P. Russ; Andrew Sveen, CFA; Ralph Hinckley, CFA; Christopher Remington

Read Full Paper


Monthly Market Monitor

Monthly Market Monitor

Concise economic and asset class data in clear, impactful charts.


Filter All Insights

Use the form below to filter insights by Topic Category or Content Type.

Topic Category

Content Type


Filter Insights by Date:     or  Show recent results
The article below is presented as a single post. Click here to view all posts.

All Articles ()

There are currently no articles for this filter

By Vishal Khanduja, CFACalvert Fixed Income Portfolio Manager and Brian S. Ellis, CFACalvert Fixed Income Portfolio Manager

This is the first of a series of blogs based on Calvert's white paper: Responsible fixed-income Investing: How Calvert has delivered for asset owners.

Boston - For fixed-income investors, understanding environmental, social and governance (ESG) factors - as they are financially material to performance - has proven to be critical in assessing an issuer's fundamental quality.

In our experience, integrating ESG factors into traditional fundamental research, combined with active engagement, can enhance long-term investment performance and create positive impact. Recent research has also shown this to be the case.

Responsible Investing approach larger than impact

Perhaps the most common conception of Responsible fixed-income investing involves "direct impact" - a green bond, for example, for the financing of a renewable energy project. While impact certainly is important and a large focus at Calvert, it represents just one facet of our process.

Calvert's approach to fixed income is best viewed in the larger context of Responsible Investing. The core premise is that companies must address a range of ESG factors that materially affect their industries. Thus, the picture of an issuer's long-term outlook is incomplete unless it reveals how these financially material factors are recognized and controlled by management.

May 21 blog Image

For illustrative purposes only.

Sector-based coverage

Our process seeks to integrate ESG factors into traditional fundamental research. Complete sector-based research coverage by specialized teams forms the backbone of our process. ESG analysis applies to the principal sectors of securitized bonds, green bonds, floating-rate loans and municipal bonds; sector preference is driven by the team's top-down view. The opportunity set defined by the ESG analysis is integrated with traditional credit analysis, technical analysis and structural analysis, resulting in security selection. Risk-adjusted portfolios are constructed in keeping with the team's top-down view.

Early ESG research focused on equities. For example, Khan, Serafeim and Yoon showed that companies improving their performance in industry-specific material ESG issues outperform their competitors in the future, both in terms of accounting and stock market performance. (Khan, Mozaffar and Serafeim, George and Yoon, Aaron, "Corporate Sustainability: First Evidence on Materiality," The Accounting Review, Vol. 91, No. 6 (2016), pp. 1697-1724.) More recently, similar research by Barclays and Bank of America/Merrill Lynch points to the role ESG factors can have in improving risk-adjusted performance in the corporate bond market. (Sources: Barclays, "Sustainable investing and bond returns," 2017, Bank of America/Merrill Lynch, "The ABC's of ESG," September 10, 2018.)

Seeking superior investment performance and positive impact, Calvert has developed comprehensive and scalable research capable of generating competitive financial results from a large issuer universe. Our process looks to address the demand for responsible capital allocation to bond portfolios by considering impact as an ongoing part of portfolio construction.

Bottom line: In our experience, integrating ESG factors into traditional fundamental research, with active engagement, can potentially enhance long-term investment performance and create positive impact.

Investing primarily in responsible investments carries the risk that, under certain market conditions, they may underperform investments that do not utilize a responsible investment strategy.

Eaton Vance is not affiliated with the authors of Corporate Sustainability: First Evidence on Materiality or Barclays and Bank of America/Merrill Lynch.

The views expressed in these posts are those of the authors and are current only through the date stated. These views are subject to change at any time based upon market or other conditions, and Eaton Vance disclaims any responsibility to update such views. These views may not be relied upon as investment advice and, because investment decisions for Eaton Vance are based on many factors, may not be relied upon as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any Eaton Vance strategy. The discussion herein is general in nature and is provided for informational purposes only. There is no guarantee as to its accuracy or completeness.